The Exciting Universe Of Music Theory
presents

more than you ever wanted to know about...

# Scale 1315: "Pyritonic"

### Bracelet Diagram

The bracelet shows tones that are in this scale, starting from the top (12 o'clock), going clockwise in ascending semitones. The "i" icon marks imperfect tones that do not have a tone a fifth above. Dotted lines indicate axes of symmetry.

### Tonnetz Diagram

Tonnetz diagrams are popular in Neo-Riemannian theory. Notes are arranged in a lattice where perfect 5th intervals are from left to right, major third are northeast, and major 6th intervals are northwest. Other directions are inverse of their opposite. This diagram helps to visualize common triads (they're triangles) and circle-of-fifth relationships (horizontal lines).

Zeitler
Pyritonic
Dozenal
IBSian

## Analysis

#### Cardinality

Cardinality is the count of how many pitches are in the scale.

5 (pentatonic)

#### Pitch Class Set

The tones in this scale, expressed as numbers from 0 to 11

{0,1,5,8,10}

#### Forte Number

A code assigned by theorist Allen Forte, for this pitch class set and all of its transpositional (rotation) and inversional (reflection) transformations.

5-27

#### Rotational Symmetry

Some scales have rotational symmetry, sometimes known as "limited transposition". If there are any rotational symmetries, these are the intervals of periodicity.

none

#### Reflection Axes

If a scale has an axis of reflective symmetry, then it can transform into itself by inversion. It also implies that the scale has Ridge Tones. Notably an axis of reflection can occur directly on a tone or half way between two tones.

none

#### Palindromicity

A palindromic scale has the same pattern of intervals both ascending and descending.

no

#### Chirality

A chiral scale can not be transformed into its inverse by rotation. If a scale is chiral, then it has an enantiomorph.

yes
enantiomorph: 2197

#### Hemitonia

A hemitone is two tones separated by a semitone interval. Hemitonia describes how many such hemitones exist.

1 (unhemitonic)

#### Cohemitonia

A cohemitone is an instance of two adjacent hemitones. Cohemitonia describes how many such cohemitones exist.

0 (ancohemitonic)

#### Imperfections

An imperfection is a tone which does not have a perfect fifth above it in the scale. This value is the quantity of imperfections in this scale.

2

#### Modes

Modes are the rotational transformations of this scale. This number includes the scale itself, so the number is usually the same as its cardinality; unless there are rotational symmetries then there are fewer modes.

5

#### Prime Form

Describes if this scale is in prime form, using the Starr/Rahn algorithm.

no
prime: 299

#### Generator

Indicates if the scale can be constructed using a generator, and an origin.

none

#### Deep Scale

A deep scale is one where the interval vector has 6 different digits, an indicator of maximum hierarchization.

no

#### Interval Structure

Defines the scale as the sequence of intervals between one tone and the next.

[1, 4, 3, 2, 2]

#### Interval Vector

Describes the intervallic content of the scale, read from left to right as the number of occurences of each interval size from semitone, up to six semitones.

<1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 0>

#### Proportional Saturation Vector

First described by Michael Buchler (2001), this is a vector showing the prominence of intervals relative to the maximum and minimum possible for the scale's cardinality. A saturation of 0 means the interval is present minimally, a saturation of 1 means it is the maximum possible.

<0.25, 0.5, 0.5, 0.333, 0.75, 0>

#### Interval Spectrum

The same as the Interval Vector, but expressed in a syntax used by Howard Hanson.

p3m2n2s2d

#### Distribution Spectra

Describes the specific interval sizes that exist for each generic interval size. Each generic <g> has a spectrum {n,...}. The Spectrum Width is the difference between the highest and lowest values in each spectrum.

<1> = {1,2,3,4}
<2> = {3,4,5,7}
<3> = {5,7,8,9}
<4> = {8,9,10,11}

#### Spectra Variation

Determined by the Distribution Spectra; this is the sum of all spectrum widths divided by the scale cardinality.

2.8

#### Maximally Even

A scale is maximally even if the tones are optimally spaced apart from each other.

no

#### Maximal Area Set

A scale is a maximal area set if a polygon described by vertices dodecimetrically placed around a circle produces the maximal interior area for scales of the same cardinality. All maximally even sets have maximal area, but not all maximal area sets are maximally even.

no

#### Interior Area

Area of the polygon described by vertices placed for each tone of the scale dodecimetrically around a unit circle, ie a circle with radius of 1.

2.049

#### Polygon Perimeter

Perimeter of the polygon described by vertices placed for each tone of the scale dodecimetrically around a unit circle.

5.664

#### Myhill Property

A scale has Myhill Property if the Distribution Spectra have exactly two specific intervals for every generic interval.

no

#### Centre of Gravity Distance

When tones of a scale are imagined as physical objects of equal weight arranged around a unit circle, this is the distance from the center of the circle to the center of gravity for all the tones. A perfectly balanced scale has a CoG distance of zero.

0.247863

#### Ridge Tones

Ridge Tones are those that appear in all transpositions of a scale upon the members of that scale. Ridge Tones correspond directly with axes of reflective symmetry.

none

#### Propriety

Also known as Rothenberg Propriety, named after its inventor. Propriety describes whether every specific interval is uniquely mapped to a generic interval. A scale is either "Proper", "Strictly Proper", or "Improper".

Improper

#### Heteromorphic Profile

Defined by Norman Carey (2002), the heteromorphic profile is an ordered triple of (c, a, d) where c is the number of contradictions, a is the number of ambiguities, and d is the number of differences. When c is zero, the scale is Proper. When a is also zero, the scale is Strictly Proper.

(3, 8, 36)

#### Coherence Quotient

The Coherence Quotient is a score between 0 and 1, indicating the proportion of coherence failures (ambiguity or contradiction) in the scale, against the maximum possible for a cardinality. A high coherence quotient indicates a less complex scale, whereas a quotient of 0 indicates a maximally complex scale.

0.56

#### Sameness Quotient

The Sameness Quotient is a score between 0 and 1, indicating the proportion of differences in the heteromorphic profile, against the maximum possible for a cardinality. A higher quotient indicates a less complex scale, whereas a quotient of 0 indicates a scale with maximum complexity.

0.1

## Generator

This scale has no generator.

These are the common triads (major, minor, augmented and diminished) that you can create from members of this scale.

* Pitches are shown with C as the root

a♯m{10,1,5}121

Above is a graph showing opportunities for parsimonious voice leading between triads*. Each line connects two triads that have two common tones, while the third tone changes by one generic scale step.

Diameter 2 1 no C♯ fm, a♯m

## Modes

Modes are the rotational transformation of this scale. Scale 1315 can be rotated to make 4 other scales. The 1st mode is itself.

 2nd mode:Scale 2705 Raga Mamata 3rd mode:Scale 425 Raga Kokil Pancham 4th mode:Scale 565 Aeolyphritonic 5th mode:Scale 1165 Gycritonic

## Prime

The prime form of this scale is Scale 299

 Scale 299 Raga Chitthakarshini

## Complement

The pentatonic modal family [1315, 2705, 425, 565, 1165] (Forte: 5-27) is the complement of the heptatonic modal family [695, 1465, 1765, 1835, 2395, 2965, 3245] (Forte: 7-27)

## Inverse

The inverse of a scale is a reflection using the root as its axis. The inverse of 1315 is 2197

## Interval Matrix

Each row is a generic interval, cells contain the specific size of each generic. Useful for identifying contradictions and ambiguities.

## Hierarchizability

Based on the work of Niels Verosky, hierarchizability is the measure of repeated patterns with "place-finding" remainder bits, applied recursively to the binary representation of a scale. For a full explanation, read Niels' paper, Hierarchizability as a Predictor of Scale Candidacy. The variable k is the maximum number of remainders allowed at each level of recursion, for them to count as an increment of hierarchizability. A high hierarchizability score is a good indicator of scale candidacy, ie a measure of usefulness for producing pleasing music. There is a strong correlation between scales with maximal hierarchizability and scales that are in popular use in a variety of world musical traditions.

kHierarchizabilityBreakdown PatternDiagram
11110001001010
21110001001010
31110001001010
421(10)00(10)0(10)(10)
521(10)00(10)0(10)(10)

## Enantiomorph

Only scales that are chiral will have an enantiomorph. Scale 1315 is chiral, and its enantiomorph is scale 2197

## Center of Gravity

If tones of the scale are imagined as identical physical objects spaced around a unit circle, the center of gravity is the point where the scale is balanced.

Position with origin in the center (-0.14641, -0.2) 0.247863 323.794 1079.313333

## Transformations:

In the abbreviation, the subscript number after "T" is the number of semitones of tranposition, "M" means the pitch class is multiplied by 5, and "I" means the result is inverted. Operation is an identical way to express the same thing; the syntax is <a,b> where each tone of the set x is transformed by the equation y = ax + b. A note about the multipliers: multiplying by 1 changes nothing, multiplying by 11 produces the same result as inversion. 5 is the only non-degenerate multiplier, with the multiplier 7 producing the inverse of 5.

Abbrev Operation Result Abbrev Operation Result
T0 <1,0> 1315       T0I <11,0> 2197
T1 <1,1> 2630      T1I <11,1> 299
T2 <1,2> 1165      T2I <11,2> 598
T3 <1,3> 2330      T3I <11,3> 1196
T4 <1,4> 565      T4I <11,4> 2392
T5 <1,5> 1130      T5I <11,5> 689
T6 <1,6> 2260      T6I <11,6> 1378
T7 <1,7> 425      T7I <11,7> 2756
T8 <1,8> 850      T8I <11,8> 1417
T9 <1,9> 1700      T9I <11,9> 2834
T10 <1,10> 3400      T10I <11,10> 1573
T11 <1,11> 2705      T11I <11,11> 3146
Abbrev Operation Result Abbrev Operation Result
T0M <5,0> 55      T0MI <7,0> 3457
T1M <5,1> 110      T1MI <7,1> 2819
T2M <5,2> 220      T2MI <7,2> 1543
T3M <5,3> 440      T3MI <7,3> 3086
T4M <5,4> 880      T4MI <7,4> 2077
T5M <5,5> 1760      T5MI <7,5> 59
T6M <5,6> 3520      T6MI <7,6> 118
T7M <5,7> 2945      T7MI <7,7> 236
T8M <5,8> 1795      T8MI <7,8> 472
T9M <5,9> 3590      T9MI <7,9> 944
T10M <5,10> 3085      T10MI <7,10> 1888
T11M <5,11> 2075      T11MI <7,11> 3776

The transformations that map this set to itself are: T0

## Nearby Scales:

These are other scales that are similar to this one, created by adding a tone, removing a tone, or moving one note up or down a semitone.

 Scale 1313 Akha 4 Tone Type 2 Scale 1317 Chaio Scale 1319 Phronimic Scale 1323 Ritsu Scale 1331 Raga Vasantabhairavi Scale 1283 HURian Scale 1299 Aerophitonic Scale 1347 IGOian Scale 1379 Kycrimic Scale 1443 Raga Phenadyuti Scale 1059 GIKian Scale 1187 Kokin-joshi Scale 1571 Lagitonic Scale 1827 Katygimic Scale 291 Raga Lavangi Scale 803 Loritonic Scale 2339 Raga Kshanika Scale 3363 Rogimic

This scale analysis was created by Ian Ring, Canadian Composer of works for Piano, and total music theory nerd. Scale notation generated by VexFlow and Lilypond, graph visualization by Graphviz, audio by TiMIDIty and FFMPEG. All other diagrams and visualizations are © Ian Ring. Some scale names used on this and other pages are ©2005 William Zeitler (http://allthescales.org) used with permission.

Pitch spelling algorithm employed here is adapted from a method by Uzay Bora, Baris Tekin Tezel, and Alper Vahaplar. (DOI, Patent owner: Dokuz Eylül University, Used with Permission.

Tons of background resources contributed to the production of this summary; for a list of these peruse this Bibliography. Special thanks to Richard Repp for helping with technical accuracy, and George Howlett for assistance with naming the Carnatic ragas. Thanks to Niels Verosky for collaborating on the Hierarchizability diagrams. Thanks to u/howaboot for inventing the Center of Gravity metrics.